Should the Packers Re-Sign Trevon Diggs? Revisiting a Low-Risk, High-Upside Move at Cornerback

The Green Bay Packers still have unfinished business in their secondary—and one familiar name is back in the conversation. After releasing Trevon Diggs earlier this offseason, the question now is simple: should Green Bay bring him back on a cheaper, team-friendly deal?

With the cornerback market thinning out and depth still a concern, revisiting Diggs might not just be logical—it could be necessary.

Why the Packers Moved On (and Why That Might Change)

When the Packers initially released Diggs, it wasn’t purely about performance. The move was largely driven by financial considerations.

After claiming him off waivers from the Dallas Cowboys late in the 2025 season, Green Bay inherited a contract that simply didn’t fit their cap structure. By cutting him, they freed up approximately $15 million—valuable flexibility that helped shape their offseason.

At the time, the decision made sense.

But now? The context has shifted.

Top free-agent cornerbacks have already signed elsewhere, and the Packers are left searching for affordable, viable depth options. That reality reopens the door for a Diggs reunion—this time at a much lower price.

Evaluating Diggs’ Limited Sample in Green Bay

Diggs’ brief stint with the Packers offered very little to evaluate.

He played just:

• 33 snaps in the regular-season finale against the Minnesota Vikings
• 1 snap in the Wild Card game versus the Chicago Bears

That’s hardly enough to form a definitive judgment.

However, in those limited reps—especially against Minnesota—he showed flashes of physicality and willingness to contribute in run support. While not spectacular, it was encouraging given his recent injury history.

Looking at his broader 2025 performance (including time in Dallas and Green Bay), Diggs allowed:

• 18 completions on 24 targets
• 288 yards
• 4 touchdowns

Those numbers aren’t elite—but they’re also not disastrous, especially considering the instability and injuries he dealt with.

The Contract Question: The Key to Everything

Any potential reunion hinges on one critical factor: money.

At 27 years old, Diggs is still in his athletic prime and may be inclined to wait for a stronger offer. However, the market may not fully align with his expectations.

According to projections, his next deal could land around:

• 1 year, $7.5 million

For the Packers, that’s a manageable figure—especially if structured with incentives or minimal guarantees.

If Green Bay can land Diggs at or below that price point, the risk becomes minimal. And the upside? Potentially significant.

Because if they get anything close to the 2022–2023 version of Diggs—when he was one of the league’s premier ballhawks—it’s a bargain.

A Clear Need at Cornerback

Even after adding Benjamin St-Juste, the Packers’ cornerback room remains thin.

St-Juste profiles more as:

• A rotational defender
• A special teams contributor

Meanwhile, the team moved on from Nate Hobbs, effectively swapping one depth piece for another without truly upgrading the unit.

That leaves significant pressure on:

• Carrington Valentine
• Keisean Nixon

Both players have shown promise, but neither should be handed uncontested starting roles. Competition is essential—and right now, it’s lacking.

Scheme Fit: Why Diggs Could Thrive Under Jonathan Gannon

The arrival of defensive coordinator Jonathan Gannon adds another layer to this discussion.

Gannon’s preferred system often emphasizes:

• Split-safety looks
• Quarters coverage
• Zone-heavy principles

This is where Diggs becomes especially intriguing.

Unlike pure man-to-man corners, Diggs thrives when:

• He can keep plays in front of him
• Read the quarterback’s eyes
• Take calculated risks on the ball

His career 20 interceptions highlight his instincts and playmaking ability. Even though his famous 11-interception season is several years behind him, that ballhawk mentality hasn’t disappeared.

In the right system, it can be unlocked again.

And Gannon’s scheme might be exactly that environment.

Risk vs. Reward: A Classic Low-Cost Gamble

Re-signing Diggs wouldn’t be without risk:

• Durability concerns since 2023
• Inconsistent recent production
• Potential mismatch between expectations and role

But the reward?

• Veteran presence in a young secondary
• Turnover creation in a defense that struggled to generate takeaways
• Affordable depth with starting upside

For a team that needs both stability and playmaking, that’s a gamble worth considering.

Draft Implications

The Packers are expected to target a cornerback in the 2026 NFL Draft. However, relying solely on rookies is dangerous—especially for a team with playoff aspirations.

If Green Bay:

• Misses out on top-tier prospects
• Or drafts a developmental player

Then bringing back Diggs becomes even more logical.

He provides a safety net—someone who can start if needed, or rotate while younger players develop.

Final Verdict: Should the Packers Bring Him Back?

Yes—if the price is right.

The Green Bay Packers don’t need Trevon Diggs to be a superstar. They need him to be:

• Reliable
• Opportunistic
• Competitive

On a team-friendly deal, he checks all those boxes.

And in a secondary that has struggled for consistency and playmaking, adding a proven ballhawk—even one with some volatility—could be exactly what this defense needs.

With Diggs recently spotted training alongside Micah Parsons, the speculation only grows stronger.

A reunion isn’t guaranteed.

But it might just make too much sense to ignore.