The Chicago Cubs entered the offseason with a clear understanding that incremental improvement would no longer be enough to compete seriously in the National League, prompting leadership to pursue structural changes aimed at elevating the franchise to a higher competitive tier.
After several seasons of rebuilding and evaluating internal talent, the Cubs’ front office determined that meaningful progress required a bolder approach, particularly in addressing lineup consistency, clubhouse leadership, and the overall balance between veteran experience and emerging youth.

That philosophy became evident quickly in free agency, where Chicago focused its resources on reshaping the infield, an area viewed internally as the foundation for both defensive stability and offensive reliability over the course of a demanding season.
The most significant move came with the signing of Alex Bregman, whose contract carries the highest average annual value in franchise history, signaling a firm commitment to contention rather than another transitional year of measured expectations.
Bregman arrives in Chicago not merely as an elite third baseman, but as a proven postseason performer whose experience in high pressure environments is expected to resonate deeply within a clubhouse still defining its long term identity.
His presence immediately raises the ceiling of the Cubs’ infield, offering consistency at the plate, precision in the field, and leadership qualities that extend well beyond box score contributions or advanced metrics.
However, as with any franchise altering acquisition, excitement was quickly accompanied by questions, particularly regarding how Bregman’s arrival would affect the development and role of young infielder Matt Shaw.
Shaw, entering just his second major league season, handled third base responsibilities last year with impressive defensive poise, showcasing range, arm strength, and instincts that exceeded many preseason expectations.
While Shaw’s glove earned consistent praise from coaches and evaluators alike, his offensive production fluctuated, highlighting the natural adjustment curve faced by young players adapting to major league pitching.
Despite those growing pains, Shaw’s overall performance reinforced his status as a key long term asset, making the positional overlap created by Bregman’s signing a complex roster puzzle rather than a simple depth adjustment.
Early communication from both the organization and Shaw himself suggests that a utility or backup infield role is the most likely outcome entering the 2026 season, though that role may evolve dynamically over time.
Still, speculation intensified when discussion turned toward second baseman Nico Hoerner, a respected veteran entering the final year of his contract and one of the most recognizable figures within the Cubs’ clubhouse.
Hoerner’s value extends far beyond his on field production, as teammates frequently point to his professionalism, preparation, and leadership as stabilizing forces during periods of roster turnover and youthful transition.
Nevertheless, contract timing inevitably introduces uncertainty, particularly for teams attempting to balance competitive urgency with long term roster sustainability and asset management.
While most league insiders believe Chicago has little interest in moving Hoerner, the possibility cannot be entirely dismissed, especially given the premium value of middle infield defense across Major League Baseball.
That speculation gained additional momentum after a recent video surfaced showing Matt Shaw taking ground balls at second base during workouts, an image that immediately captured attention among fans and analysts alike.
In the footage, Shaw is seen working at the keystone position while top ten prospect James Triantos handled shortstop, a pairing that sparked renewed conversation regarding positional flexibility and contingency planning.
On its own, such defensive work could easily be dismissed as routine cross training, particularly during early season preparation when organizations prioritize versatility and adaptability across the roster.
Yet within the broader context of roster uncertainty, even routine drills take on amplified significance, especially when involving young players whose development paths remain fluid.
Despite the noise surrounding that video, multiple sources indicate that any serious discussion involving Hoerner would require a substantial return, one significant enough to justify disrupting both lineup continuity and clubhouse chemistry.
As a result, expectations remain strong that Hoerner will still be wearing a Cubs uniform when Opening Day arrives, barring an unforeseen offer that fundamentally reshapes Chicago’s long term outlook.
From the organization’s perspective, Shaw’s expanded defensive work is less about signaling an imminent trade and more about ensuring readiness across multiple scenarios that could unfold over a long season.
The Cubs have increasingly emphasized defensive flexibility as a strategic advantage, particularly in managing injuries, rest schedules, and matchup driven lineup adjustments throughout the calendar.

Shaw’s athletic profile lends itself naturally to that philosophy, as his footwork, arm strength, and baseball IQ translate well across several infield positions.
In addition to second and third base, internal evaluations have also explored the possibility of Shaw receiving limited outfield reps, a role he last filled during his collegiate career.
While such usage would likely be situational rather than regular, it underscores Chicago’s desire to maximize roster efficiency without sacrificing defensive reliability.
For Shaw personally, embracing a multi positional role presents both opportunity and challenge, requiring mental adaptability while maintaining offensive rhythm in a potentially fluctuating lineup presence.
If he can establish greater consistency at the plate while continuing to deliver dependable defense wherever needed, Shaw could emerge as one of the Cubs’ most valuable contributors despite not holding a fixed everyday position.
Modern roster construction increasingly rewards players capable of filling “super utility” roles, and successful postseason teams often rely on such versatility during critical stretches of the season.
Chicago’s front office appears acutely aware of that trend, viewing Shaw not as displaced by Bregman, but repositioned within a broader strategic framework.
The 2026 season therefore represents a pivotal chapter for Shaw, offering a chance to redefine his role while reinforcing his long term importance to the organization.
At the same time, decisions surrounding Bregman, Hoerner, and the infield alignment will continue to shape the Cubs’ trajectory as they attempt to convert offseason ambition into tangible on field results.
Ultimately, Chicago’s willingness to embrace complexity rather than avoid it reflects a franchise transitioning from rebuilding to competing, where adaptability may prove just as valuable as star power.