Greetings late night Cubs fans, whatever brought you to our end of the week pop-up coffee shop, we\u2019re glad you\u2019re here. You\u2019ll find drinks to keep you up, drinks to chill you out, intriguing questions and robust arguments. Be sure you bus your tables, I\u2019d hate to leave a mess for Josh on Monday when we hand this space back to him.<\/p>\n
Like all of our Fantasy Friday conversations, tonight\u2019s topic is pulled from the fantasy baseball headlines (albeit with a Cubs twist). This one is inspired by some chatter at the Arizona Fall League. I\u2019m here in Mesa steps away from Sloan Park attending First Pitch Arizona. If you ever wondered what a fantasy baseball conference is like, well, lots of people discussing what trades could look like 4-5 years in the future is it.<\/p>\n
After a great session on prospects I was chatting with Chris Blessing, who is a guru that writes at BaseballHQ amongst many other places. I couldn\u2019t help but ask about the absolute haul the Cubs parted with for current first baseman Michael Busch, because I was skeptical about it when it happened. However, in the interim, I\u2019ve just had a sinking suspicion that we\u2019re going to look back on this one in a few years as a mistake.<\/p>\n
Before we talk about Zyhir Hope, though, we should talk about some music.<\/p>\n
My brother introduced me to Jack Johnson while I was still in college. Brushfire Fairytales was Jack Johnson\u2019s first commercial release and really an outstanding collection of songs that really channeled low key guitar vibes that made me want to dance. While the most well-known songs on that CD were Flake <\/em>and Bubble Toes<\/em> today I\u2019m going to dive deep into the tracks for Losing Hope<\/em> instead:<\/p>\n I got a faulty parachute I got a stranger\u2019s friend<\/em> I always love doing a deep dive into a famous album. Like, yes, it\u2019s fun to research a song and learn everything that went into inspiring it for the artist. However, sometimes it\u2019s nice to leave all of that to the listener, the vibes we feel, the history it evokes for us. After all, that\u2019s how music generally works. No longform pieces or interviews, maybe some album notes or lyrics to avoid confusion. But generally, just the artist and what they put out in the world for our ears to capture.<\/p>\n Well somebody\u2019s something was left in the room<\/em> That\u2019s where the real magic of music lives \u2014 in the interpretation. The cross-application of the ideas that sprang from the pen, guitar, piano or ideas of an artist, to our own lives. Our individual moments.<\/p>\n Losing hope is easy<\/em> Humans aren\u2019t always great at change. We oftentimes prefer the predictability of patterns in our life that make our lives easier. Change often flies in the face of that predictability, and even if that change is for the better in the short-term, you never know about the mid- or long-term.<\/p>\n One of the places change comes at baseball fans fast and furious is trades.<\/p>\n Last year the Cubs made a big deal for a ready for MLB first baseman, Michael Busch. By pretty much every account that was a short-term win for the North Siders. Busch was very good for the Cubs in 2024. He hit .248\/.335\/.440 with 21 home runs. The strikeout rate was a bit on the high side at 28.6 percent, but his walk rate was a solid 11.1 percent. By putting up 2.3 fWAR at first base, Busch solidified himself as a top 10 first baseman, ranking ninth, just behind the Braves\u2019 Matt Olson and just ahead of the Guardians\u2019 Josh Naylor. You can see the top 15 qualified first basemen by fWAR below:<\/p>\n Qualified hitters w\/ select statsFanGraphs<\/cite><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The thing is, the asking price for Michael Busch wasn\u2019t cheap. The Cubs received Michael Busch and on-again, off-again bullpen arm, Yency Almonte. The Dodgers received two very young, but very interesting, prospects in Jackson Ferris and Zyhir Hope.<\/p>\n Most analyses of this trade to date have looked at the Ferris side of it and for good reason. Ferris is a second round draft pick who the Cubs offered overslot value to sign with the team out of high school. He\u2019s 20 years old with a plus slider and a plus curveball. Last year he peaked in Double-A and while there are a few more walks than I\u2019d like, he\u2019s generally been a solid strikeout guy whose 2.98 FIP in 98\u2153 High-A innings was a bit better than the 3.39 ERA he put up there. In Double-A he threw 28\u2153 innings to the tune of a 2.54 ERA, although the FIP was less gaudy at 4.40. Suffice to say, a 20-year old starting pitcher Cubs fans would love to still have in their system.<\/p>\n In fact, last season in early March Ferris was listed as the 17th best prospect in a stacked Dodgers\u2019 system and as of this writing that\u2019s where he still sits according to FanGraphs prospect board. And don\u2019t get me wrong, Ferris is great. Below is his write-up from March:<\/p>\n Signed for $3 million as a second rounder in 2022, Ferris didn\u2019t pitch at an affiliate after the draft and was handled pretty conservatively during his pro debut, as he made 18 starts but only pitched 56 strikeout- and walk-heavy innings. He was traded to Los Angeles during the offseason as part of the Michael Busch swap with the Cubs. Ferris\u2019 combination of velocity (up to 96 mph), fastball carry, breaking ball snap, and frame give him meaningful upside. His feel for location is so raw that he has a little more relief risk than a typical $3-million signee, though sometimes guys with lanky frames like this gain control of their bodies later.<\/p>\n Ferris has a powerful lower half, bending deep into his blocking leg. He also strides open, clearing his front side to help enable an extremely vertical arm slot. The combination of the two helps Ferris\u2019 fastball have flatter angle than is typical for a pitcher this tall and with such a high arm slot. If he can live more consistently at the top of the strike zone as he matures, his mid-90s fastball could dominate up there. The vertical slot helps him create depth on his breaking balls, and Ferris can turn over a changeup from that slot, albeit with some slot variation. He threw his changeup less than I expected last season and the quality of that pitch was a little worse than my pre-draft grades. The Dodgers have done a great job developing changeups and that pitch may yet take a leap in pro ball. Ferris\u2019 style of pitching with his fastball is such that he will probably always be an inefficient operator, but he has the raw stuff to be a no. 4 starter if he can improve his changeup and command. If his arm strength also improves as he matures, then we\u2019re talking about significant impact.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n It\u2019s possible that Ferris alone could figure some things out and have Cubs fans groaning over this trade in a few years. However, the man on the move, the man who may be the dagger in the heart of Cubs fans in 2028, is the man who has rocketed from outside the top 49 prospects to the sixth-best prospect in the Dodgers system since the Cubs traded him. The man who is intriguing the Arizona Fall League even though he doesn\u2019t turn 20 until January. That man is Zyhir Hope.<\/p>\n Hope was drafted in 2023 in the 11th round out of high school in Virginia. His $400,000 signing bonus as 13.3 percent as large as Jackson Ferris\u2019. But Hope has broken out in prospect circles and a big reason for that is the power speed combo he offers. Hope is currently graded as a 25\/65 game power, 60\/70 raw power and 70\/60 speed according to FanGraphs. He\u2019s so young that every level of professional ball he\u2019s played at is a small sample size, but in 248 A-Ball at bats last year he hit nine home runs and snagged eight bases while hitting .287\/.415\/.490.<\/p>\n To be clear, as Blessing and I discussed earlier today, it could still have been the right move from the Cubs perspective to make the Busch trade even if Ferris and Hope hit their apex. First base had been a black hole for the Cubs since they traded Anthony Rizzo and when Matt Mervis didn\u2019t pan out they really didn\u2019t have a lot of ready-made options there. Busch fits a need for the team now \u2014 but it cost them a pitcher who could stick in some other rotation and a bat that looks a lot better than when he was moved. It is a very good reminder that evaluating trades too early is rarely accurate.<\/p>\n So as we head into the first weekend in November before turning this space back over to Josh and jazz on Monday night, I ask you \u2014 will the Cubs regret trading Zyhir Hope?<\/p>\n (4 votes)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n (10 votes)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n (14 votes)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n 28 votes total Vote Now<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Your late night coffee shop spot peers into our crystal ball<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":3613,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mlb"],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\nAn exciting change in my butcher\u2019s blend<\/em>
\nA symbol on the ceiling with the flick of a switch<\/em>
\nMy newfound hero in the enemy\u2019s ditch<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\nAnd now that it\u2019s gone well of course we assume<\/em>
\nSomebody else needed something so bad<\/em>
\nThey took everything somebody had <\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\nWhen your only friend is gone<\/em>
\nAnd every time you look around<\/em>
\nWell it all, it all just seems to change<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\nTop 1B by fWAR 2024<\/h3>\n
\n\n
\n \nName<\/th>\n Team<\/th>\n G<\/th>\n PA<\/th>\n HR<\/th>\n R<\/th>\n RBI<\/th>\n SB<\/th>\n BB%<\/th>\n K%<\/th>\n ISO<\/th>\n BABIP<\/th>\n AVG<\/th>\n OBP<\/th>\n SLG<\/th>\n wOBA<\/th>\n xwOBA<\/th>\n wRC+<\/th>\n WAR<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n \nName<\/th>\n Team<\/th>\n G<\/th>\n PA<\/th>\n HR<\/th>\n R<\/th>\n RBI<\/th>\n SB<\/th>\n BB%<\/th>\n K%<\/th>\n ISO<\/th>\n BABIP<\/th>\n AVG<\/th>\n OBP<\/th>\n SLG<\/th>\n wOBA<\/th>\n xwOBA<\/th>\n wRC+<\/th>\n WAR<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tfoot>\n \n Vladimir Guerrero Jr.<\/td>\n TOR<\/td>\n 159<\/td>\n 697<\/td>\n 30<\/td>\n 98<\/td>\n 103<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n 10.33%<\/td>\n 13.77%<\/td>\n .221<\/td>\n .342<\/td>\n .323<\/td>\n .396<\/td>\n .544<\/td>\n .398<\/td>\n .410<\/td>\n 165<\/td>\n 5.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Bryce Harper<\/td>\n PHI<\/td>\n 145<\/td>\n 631<\/td>\n 30<\/td>\n 85<\/td>\n 87<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n 12.04%<\/td>\n 21.87%<\/td>\n .240<\/td>\n .331<\/td>\n .285<\/td>\n .373<\/td>\n .525<\/td>\n .380<\/td>\n .361<\/td>\n 145<\/td>\n 5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Freddie Freeman<\/td>\n LAD<\/td>\n 147<\/td>\n 638<\/td>\n 22<\/td>\n 81<\/td>\n 89<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n 12.23%<\/td>\n 15.67%<\/td>\n .194<\/td>\n .306<\/td>\n .282<\/td>\n .378<\/td>\n .476<\/td>\n .365<\/td>\n .370<\/td>\n 137<\/td>\n 4.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Salvador Perez<\/td>\n KCR<\/td>\n 158<\/td>\n 652<\/td>\n 27<\/td>\n 58<\/td>\n 104<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 6.75%<\/td>\n 19.79%<\/td>\n .185<\/td>\n .302<\/td>\n .271<\/td>\n .330<\/td>\n .456<\/td>\n .335<\/td>\n .362<\/td>\n 115<\/td>\n 3.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Carlos Santana<\/td>\n MIN<\/td>\n 150<\/td>\n 594<\/td>\n 23<\/td>\n 63<\/td>\n 71<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n 10.94%<\/td>\n 16.67%<\/td>\n .182<\/td>\n .252<\/td>\n .238<\/td>\n .328<\/td>\n .420<\/td>\n .326<\/td>\n .330<\/td>\n 114<\/td>\n 3.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Christian Walker<\/td>\n ARI<\/td>\n 130<\/td>\n 552<\/td>\n 26<\/td>\n 72<\/td>\n 84<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n 9.96%<\/td>\n 24.09%<\/td>\n .217<\/td>\n .287<\/td>\n .251<\/td>\n .335<\/td>\n .468<\/td>\n .343<\/td>\n .354<\/td>\n 119<\/td>\n 3.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Nathaniel Lowe<\/td>\n TEX<\/td>\n 140<\/td>\n 565<\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n 62<\/td>\n 69<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n 12.57%<\/td>\n 22.12%<\/td>\n .136<\/td>\n .324<\/td>\n .265<\/td>\n .361<\/td>\n .401<\/td>\n .337<\/td>\n .329<\/td>\n 121<\/td>\n 2.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Matt Olson<\/td>\n ATL<\/td>\n 162<\/td>\n 685<\/td>\n 29<\/td>\n 78<\/td>\n 98<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 10.36%<\/td>\n 24.82%<\/td>\n .210<\/td>\n .293<\/td>\n .247<\/td>\n .333<\/td>\n .457<\/td>\n .339<\/td>\n .342<\/td>\n 117<\/td>\n 2.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Michael Busch<\/td>\n CHC<\/td>\n 152<\/td>\n 567<\/td>\n 21<\/td>\n 73<\/td>\n 65<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n 11.11%<\/td>\n 28.57%<\/td>\n .192<\/td>\n .322<\/td>\n .248<\/td>\n .335<\/td>\n .440<\/td>\n .336<\/td>\n .321<\/td>\n 119<\/td>\n 2.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Josh Naylor<\/td>\n CLE<\/td>\n 152<\/td>\n 633<\/td>\n 31<\/td>\n 84<\/td>\n 108<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n 9.16%<\/td>\n 16.59%<\/td>\n .213<\/td>\n .246<\/td>\n .243<\/td>\n .320<\/td>\n .456<\/td>\n .332<\/td>\n .334<\/td>\n 118<\/td>\n 2.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Pete Alonso<\/td>\n NYM<\/td>\n 162<\/td>\n 695<\/td>\n 34<\/td>\n 91<\/td>\n 88<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n 10.07%<\/td>\n 24.75%<\/td>\n .219<\/td>\n .276<\/td>\n .240<\/td>\n .329<\/td>\n .459<\/td>\n .340<\/td>\n .345<\/td>\n 122<\/td>\n 2.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Jake Cronenworth<\/td>\n SDP<\/td>\n 155<\/td>\n 656<\/td>\n 17<\/td>\n 72<\/td>\n 83<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n 9.30%<\/td>\n 17.99%<\/td>\n .149<\/td>\n .274<\/td>\n .241<\/td>\n .324<\/td>\n .390<\/td>\n .315<\/td>\n .338<\/td>\n 105<\/td>\n 2.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Yandy D\u00edaz<\/td>\n TBR<\/td>\n 145<\/td>\n 621<\/td>\n 14<\/td>\n 55<\/td>\n 65<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 8.05%<\/td>\n 15.30%<\/td>\n .133<\/td>\n .314<\/td>\n .281<\/td>\n .341<\/td>\n .414<\/td>\n .331<\/td>\n .337<\/td>\n 120<\/td>\n 1.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Ryan Mountcastle<\/td>\n BAL<\/td>\n 124<\/td>\n 507<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n 54<\/td>\n 63<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n 5.33%<\/td>\n 22.49%<\/td>\n .154<\/td>\n .327<\/td>\n .271<\/td>\n .308<\/td>\n .425<\/td>\n .316<\/td>\n .335<\/td>\n 108<\/td>\n 1.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Vinnie Pasquantino<\/td>\n KCR<\/td>\n 131<\/td>\n 554<\/td>\n 19<\/td>\n 64<\/td>\n 97<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n 7.22%<\/td>\n 12.82%<\/td>\n .183<\/td>\n .265<\/td>\n .262<\/td>\n .315<\/td>\n .446<\/td>\n .325<\/td>\n .331<\/td>\n 108<\/td>\n 1.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n
Poll<\/h3>\n
Did the Cubs make a mistake trading Zyhir Hope?<\/h4>\n
\n
14%<\/h6>\n
Yes \u2014 he looks like a potential star<\/h6>\n
35%<\/h6>\n
No \u2014 even if succeeds they needed Busch<\/h6>\n
50%<\/h6>\n
Eh \u2014 it\u2019s too early to tell<\/h6>\n