![\"Sep](\"https:\/\/images2.minutemediacdn.com\/image\/upload\/c_crop,x_0,y_0,w_3682,h_2071\/c_fill,w_720,ar_16:9,f_auto,q_auto,g_auto\/images\/ImagnImages\/mmsport\/3\/01kgakf17ahnq8xrjz40.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
AUSTIN HAYS AND THE NEW YORK METS: WHY THE MATCH NEVER HAPPENED AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE 2026 SEASON<\/strong><\/p>\n Austin Hays<\/em> could have been a solid fit for the New York Mets<\/em> as a left-field option to start the 2026 season<\/em>. A right-handed hitter known for his ability to mash left-handed pitchers, Hays would have provided the Mets with an excellent platoon option in the outfield, helping bridge the gap until Carson Benge<\/em> was ready to take over full-time duties. However, despite initial interest, the Mets ultimately abandoned their pursuit of Hays, and he signed a one-year deal<\/em> worth $6 million<\/em> with the Chicago White Sox<\/em>.<\/p>\n Given the destination and terms of the deal, it seems that both the Mets and Hays opted for different paths. For Hays, the White Sox<\/em> offer provided the opportunity for a consistent role<\/em> on a team with a puncher’s chance<\/em> at finishing with a .500 record<\/em> in 2026. For the Mets, Brett Baty<\/em> will now be their left-field option<\/em> to start the season, with Carson Benge<\/em> serving as the backup plan in case Baty doesn\u2019t perform well enough to secure the position out of spring training<\/em>.<\/p>\n One of the key reasons the Mets didn\u2019t move forward with Austin Hays<\/em> was similar to the situation with Harrison Bader<\/em>. Both players have reputations as strong right-handed hitters against left-handed pitching<\/em>, making them ideal candidates for platoons. However, the Mets already had plans for a future where Carson Benge<\/em> would eventually take over the starting left-field role. Bringing in a player like Hays, who would be in a platoon, likely didn\u2019t fit into the long-term vision for the Mets.<\/p>\n If Hays had signed with the Mets, he could have started in left field temporarily, but once Benge<\/em> was ready, those at-bats would have been limited. A right-handed hitter like Hays could have complemented Benge in a platoon<\/em> role later in the season. Still, this wasn\u2019t a scenario the Mets were committed to, and it seems like both sides decided on different directions.<\/p>\n With Hays off the table, the Mets\u2019 bench<\/em> remains one of the more questionable aspects of their 2026 roster<\/em>. As it stands, Luis Torrens<\/em> and Tyrone Taylor<\/em> are among the bench options, but the Mets still have gaps to fill. If Brett Baty<\/em> indeed secures the left-field spot, then Carson Benge<\/em> would be the backup plan, depending on his performance in spring training<\/em>. There\u2019s also the possibility of Ronny Mauricio<\/em> making the team, but questions remain about whether the Mets will prioritize adding an additional outfielder or infielder to round out the roster.<\/p>\n The absence of a more permanent outfield solution<\/em> like Hays leaves the Mets with limited options for the left field, especially if Baty<\/em> struggles or if Benge<\/em> doesn\u2019t make the roster. The Mets\u2019 decision to bypass Hays means they are likely looking to make a different move\u2014possibly even a trade<\/em>\u2014to address the outfield<\/em> depth if needed. One possibility could be Ramon Laureano<\/em>, although there has been no indication that the Mets are actively pursuing a trade for him.<\/p>\n Hays\u2019 decision to accept a modest one-year deal<\/em> with the White Sox<\/em> reflects his status as a solid, but not extraordinary, player. Turning 31<\/em> this summer, Hays will look to have another strong campaign to earn a similar contract next offseason. His deal with the White Sox<\/em> includes a $6 million<\/em> salary for 2026, providing him with a chance to showcase his talents as a regular contributor in the outfield.<\/p>\n For the Mets<\/em>, the decision not to pursue Hays may end up being a wise one, as they are opting to develop their younger talent, like Baty<\/em> and Benge<\/em>, rather than committing to an established player for the short term. This approach gives them flexibility to make other moves down the line if needed, and it allows their young players the opportunity to prove themselves at the Major League level<\/em>.<\/p>\n Ultimately, the Mets<\/em> seem content with their current outfield setup, with Baty<\/em> as the projected left fielder and Benge<\/em> waiting in the wings. The bench depth<\/em> and defensive flexibility<\/em> will be a crucial aspect to monitor during spring training<\/em>, especially if Baty struggles or if there is a need for a more experienced backup. The team\u2019s decision to pass on Hays indicates a belief in their internal options, but if the Mets feel the need to make a move, expect them to explore trade options before the season gets underway.<\/p>\n While Hays may have been a fit in the short term, the Mets are choosing to go in a different direction\u2014one that may involve more development and less reliance on outside acquisitions. With a deep roster<\/em> and a talented farm system<\/em>, the Mets are poised for an exciting season, and their decision to pass on Hays is just one small part of their larger strategy for 2026<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" AUSTIN HAYS AND THE NEW YORK METS: WHY THE MATCH NEVER HAPPENED AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE 2026 SEASON Austin Hays could have been a solid… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":147538,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-147535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mlb"],"yoast_head":"\nWHY HAYS AND THE METS NEVER ALIGNED<\/h3>\n
THE METS\u2019 BENCH AND OUTFIELD OPTIONS<\/h3>\n
![\"New](\"https:\/\/www.si.com\/.image\/c_fill,w_720,ar_16:9,f_auto,q_auto,g_auto\/MjAyNDQ4NTM3MDQ3Mjc4NjYw\/usatsi_21509923.jpg\")
<\/p>\nHAYS\u2019 FUTURE AND THE METS\u2019 DECISION<\/h3>\n
WHAT TO EXPECT FROM THE METS IN 2026<\/h3>\n