Despite the New York Mets enduring a rapid and troubling collapse early in the 2026 season, team owner Steve Cohen has made it clear that he has no intention of making a managerial change, signaling stability at a time when frustration continues to build around the organization.

The Mets, currently holding the worst record in Major League Baseball, have naturally become the subject of intense speculation, with many expecting that manager Carlos Mendoza would be among the first to face consequences for the team’s underperformance.

However, that narrative has been firmly pushed back by leadership within the organization, particularly by president of baseball operations David Stearns, who has taken a decisive stance in defense of his manager.

According to multiple reports, Stearns has already communicated directly with Mendoza, assuring him that his position remains secure despite the team’s struggles and the growing external pressure.

“We know our record is not what we want, and we know we are capable of more,” Stearns told MLB.com, acknowledging the disappointing start while reinforcing confidence in the team’s internal structure.

More notably, Stearns emphasized that the organization does not view the situation as a managerial issue, stating clearly that no change is currently being considered.

That message reflects a broader organizational philosophy, one that prioritizes continuity and long-term evaluation over reactive decision-making during difficult stretches.

The Mets’ recent form has only intensified scrutiny, as the team has lost five of its last six games and is still reeling from a damaging 12-game losing streak that significantly derailed its early-season momentum.

This stretch has not only impacted standings but has also exposed inconsistencies across multiple areas, including pitching depth, offensive production, and overall execution in critical moments.

From a historical perspective, the current run represents one of the worst starts in franchise history, marking the poorest performance through 31 games since 1981.

Beyond that season, the only Mets team to post a worse start was the 1964 squad, a comparison that underscores the severity of the current situation and the expectations surrounding the franchise today.

Adding to the complexity of Mendoza’s position is the context of the offseason, during which he saw a significant portion of his coaching staff depart following the team’s near-miss of the 2025 postseason.

That transition inevitably impacted continuity within the clubhouse, forcing adjustments that may still be playing out as the team attempts to regain stability.

Ironically, the Mets began the 2025 campaign with the best record in baseball, only to collapse dramatically in the second half, a pattern that has carried over into the current season’s struggles.

This trend has raised questions about consistency and resilience, yet the front office appears committed to addressing those issues without making a change at the managerial level.

Mendoza is currently in the final guaranteed year of his three-year contract, which includes a club option for the 2027 season, adding another layer of consideration to the team’s decision-making process.

Choosing to retain him, despite mounting losses, suggests that the organization values stability and believes that broader roster or structural adjustments may be necessary instead.

This approach contrasts with recent actions taken by other MLB franchises, including the Boston Red Sox and the Philadelphia Phillies, both of whom dismissed their managers within the past two weeks amid underwhelming performances.

In comparison, the Mets’ restraint highlights a notable divergence in strategy, opting to maintain leadership continuity rather than initiate immediate change.

Historically, the organization has rarely made in-season managerial changes, with the last occurrence dating back to 2008, when Willie Randolph was dismissed and replaced by Jerry Manuel.

That precedent reinforces the idea that the Mets are traditionally reluctant to make midseason decisions, even in the face of significant challenges.

As the season progresses, attention will likely shift toward how the team responds on the field, rather than whether leadership changes are imminent.

The players themselves now carry the responsibility of translating internal confidence into improved performance, particularly as the schedule continues to present opportunities for recovery.

One such opportunity comes in the form of an upcoming series against the Los Angeles Angels, a team facing its own struggles and offering a potential turning point for New York.

For the Mets, this matchup represents more than just another set of games, serving instead as a chance to halt momentum, rebuild confidence, and begin reshaping the narrative of their season.

While external pressure will not disappear overnight, the organization’s unified stance behind Mendoza provides a foundation upon which the team can attempt to regroup.

Ultimately, the decision to stand by their manager sends a clear message that the Mets view their struggles as a collective issue rather than the result of a single figure on the bench.

Whether that belief proves justified will depend entirely on how the team performs in the coming weeks, as results on the field remain the ultimate measure of any organization’s direction.