The Green Bay Packers may be facing another significant coaching loss this offseason, as offensive coordinator Adam Stenavich has reportedly emerged as a serious target for an AFC franchise seeking to reshape its offensive identity.

Green Bay has already endured a notable staff departure after the Miami Dolphins hired Jeff Hafley away to serve as their new head coach, leaving the Packers with immediate questions about continuity and stability.
Now, attention has shifted to the offensive side of the ball, where Stenavich’s name has begun circulating heavily in league coaching circles following recent developments elsewhere.
According to NFL Media insider Tom Pelissero, the Tennessee Titans plan to interview Stenavich for their offensive coordinator vacancy early this week.
Pelissero reported on Sunday, January 25, that the Titans intend to speak with both Kliff Kingsbury and Adam Stenavich as part of a wide-ranging search for their next offensive leader.
Further context was added by Ted Nguyen of The Athletic, who suggested that teams across the league are increasingly attempting to lure Stenavich away by offering play-calling responsibilities he does not currently possess.
That detail is crucial in understanding why Stenavich’s future in Green Bay may now be uncertain, despite his long tenure and internal respect within the organization.
Stenavich joined the Packers’ coaching staff in 2019 as offensive line coach, arriving the same year Matt LaFleur was hired to lead the franchise.
From the outset, Stenavich played a critical role in shaping Green Bay’s offensive identity, particularly in building a physical, disciplined offensive line that supported LaFleur’s run-heavy concepts.
His impact was quickly recognized internally, leading to a promotion in 2021 when he was named offensive line coach and run-game coordinator.
That expanded role positioned Stenavich as one of LaFleur’s most trusted lieutenants, responsible for coordinating the ground attack while continuing to oversee one of the league’s more consistent offensive line units.

In 2022, LaFleur elevated Stenavich again, this time naming him offensive coordinator, a title he has now held for four consecutive seasons.
However, despite that promotion, Stenavich has never been granted full autonomy over the offense, as LaFleur has retained play-calling duties throughout his tenure.
That reality has increasingly shaped how Stenavich is perceived around the league, not as an inexperienced coordinator, but as one whose ceiling in Green Bay may already be defined.
At 43 years old, Stenavich is entering a phase of his career where advancement often hinges on tangible leadership opportunities rather than titles alone.
Across the NFL, offensive coordinators who call plays are more frequently fast-tracked into head coaching interviews, particularly if they can demonstrate quarterback development and schematic innovation.
In Green Bay, however, that pathway appears blocked as long as LaFleur remains the primary architect of the offense.
LaFleur recently signed a multiyear contract extension that runs beyond the 2026 season, effectively solidifying his control over play calling for the foreseeable future.
That extension may inadvertently signal to Stenavich that waiting for an expanded role in Green Bay could delay his career progression indefinitely.
By contrast, the Titans represent a unique and potentially career-altering opportunity.
Tennessee recently hired Robert Saleh as head coach, ushering in a new era that places a premium on rebuilding both sides of the ball.
Saleh’s defensive background makes the offensive coordinator role particularly influential within the Titans’ organizational structure.
An incoming offensive coordinator in Tennessee would likely be empowered to design the system, call plays, and shape the long-term development of the franchise’s most important asset.
That asset is quarterback Cam Ward, the No. 1 overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.
Ward enters his second professional season at a critical developmental juncture, making the Titans’ offensive coordinator hire one of the most consequential decisions of their offseason.
A successful turnaround under Ward’s leadership could dramatically elevate the profile of whichever coach orchestrates the offense.
For Stenavich, guiding a young quarterback from raw potential to consistent production would provide the type of résumé boost that often leads directly to head coaching consideration.
League history is filled with examples of coordinators who parlayed quarterback development into rapid career ascension, particularly in their early-to-mid 40s.
From that perspective, the Titans’ interest represents more than lateral movement, instead offering a clear upward trajectory.
Meanwhile, the Packers must weigh the cost of losing yet another experienced coach during a critical transitional period for their roster.
Green Bay has already endured significant change on defense, and continuity on offense has been viewed internally as a stabilizing force.
Stenavich’s familiarity with the system, personnel, and organizational culture has helped smooth offensive transitions during recent seasons.
Losing him would force LaFleur to identify a replacement capable of maintaining cohesion while potentially absorbing additional responsibilities.
That scenario is complicated by the reality that many internal candidates may lack Stenavich’s combination of experience and credibility.
Externally, hiring a new coordinator could require philosophical alignment with LaFleur’s approach, a constraint that narrows the candidate pool.
From a broader league perspective, Stenavich’s emergence as a candidate reflects how teams increasingly value offensive line expertise in modern offensive design.
His background coaching trenches has influenced his reputation as a detail-oriented, fundamentals-first strategist, particularly in run-game efficiency and pass protection schemes.
Those traits appeal to teams seeking stability and physical identity, especially franchises attempting to support young quarterbacks.
While Kliff Kingsbury offers a more pass-heavy and spread-oriented résumé, Stenavich represents a contrasting profile rooted in balance and structural discipline.
That contrast suggests the Titans are exploring multiple philosophical directions before committing to an offensive vision.
For Green Bay, the question becomes whether retaining Stenavich in a limited role remains mutually beneficial.
If Stenavich desires play-calling authority, the Packers may be unable or unwilling to accommodate that request under current leadership.
As coaching markets evolve, coordinators increasingly prioritize opportunity over security, recognizing the narrow windows available for advancement.
Stenavich’s situation encapsulates that dynamic, balancing loyalty to an organization that elevated him against ambition to reach the next professional tier.
No final decision has been made, and interviews alone do not guarantee departure.
However, interest of this magnitude often signals momentum, particularly when coupled with structural limitations at a coach’s current post.
Should Stenavich ultimately leave, the Packers would face another offseason defined by recalibration rather than continuity.
For the Titans, landing him could represent a foundational step toward offensive credibility and long-term growth.
For Stenavich himself, the coming weeks may determine whether he remains a respected coordinator without play-calling authority, or steps into a role that could redefine his career trajectory.
In an NFL increasingly driven by offensive innovation and quarterback development, opportunities like this rarely come without consequence.
How Green Bay responds, and whether Tennessee ultimately seals the hire, will shape both franchises well beyond the upcoming season.
This is not merely a coaching interview cycle, but a moment that underscores how ambition, structure, and opportunity collide across the modern NFL.