Orioles’ Interest in Justin Verlander Makes More Sense Than Fans Want to Admit
At first glance, the idea of the Baltimore Orioles pursuing Justin Verlander may not inspire overwhelming excitement among fans. After all, Verlander is a future Hall of Famer nearing the twilight of his career, not the frontline ace many hoped the Orioles would target this offseason. But once emotion is stripped away and the bigger picture is examined, Baltimore’s reported interest in Verlander starts to look far more logical than it initially appears.
Over the weekend, reports surfaced linking the Orioles to Verlander, currently with the San Francisco Giants, as the veteran right-hander prepares for free agency ahead of the 2026 MLB season. While Verlander’s résumé is unquestioned, skepticism among the fanbase is understandable—he will turn 43 years old during the 2026 season and hasn’t been a true rotation anchor since 2022.
Still, baseball decisions aren’t made in a vacuum. For the Orioles, this potential move isn’t about nostalgia or star power—it’s about cost, draft capital, and roster flexibility.
Justin Verlander’s 2025 Season: A Tale of Two Halves
Verlander’s most recent season encapsulates why opinions are so divided.
On one hand, his first half of 2025 with the Giants was rough:
-
0–7 record
-
4.70 ERA
-
4.22 FIP
-
15 starts that raised serious questions about his ability to remain effective at the highest level
For a team seeking immediate impact at the top of the rotation, those numbers are difficult to ignore.
On the other hand, Verlander’s post–All-Star break performance tells a very different story:
-
2.99 ERA
-
3.47 FIP
-
Improved command, sequencing, and pitch efficiency
That late-season surge suggests Verlander can still be a reliable and competitive starter when healthy and properly managed, even if he’s no longer a Cy Young-caliber ace.
For a team like Baltimore, which doesn’t necessarily need another superstar to lead the rotation, that distinction matters.
Why Fans Want More—and Why the Front Office Hesitates
Many Orioles fans would prefer the front office to pursue a frontline starter such as Framber Valdez or Zac Gallen, both of whom are younger and firmly entrenched among baseball’s elite pitchers.
However, there’s a critical factor often overlooked in these conversations: qualifying offers.
Both Valdez and Gallen rejected qualifying offers, meaning any team that signs them would be required to surrender draft compensation. For a franchise that has spent years building its future through the draft, that price is far from trivial.
Draft Picks Matter—Especially to the Orioles
A qualifying offer (QO) exists to compensate teams when top free agents leave. When a team signs a player attached to a QO, they must give up one or more draft picks, depending on their market size and revenue status.
Baltimore knows this system well.
Last offseason, the Orioles benefited directly from the QO process after:
-
Anthony Santander signed with the Toronto Blue Jays
-
Corbin Burnes signed with the Arizona Diamondbacks
Those departures netted Baltimore valuable draft capital, giving them six of the first 69 picks in last year’s MLB Draft. That influx of young talent aligns perfectly with the Orioles’ long-term organizational philosophy.
Giving those picks back now—especially after an already active offseason—runs counter to that strategy.
Orioles Have Already Paid a Price This Offseason
Baltimore has not been passive this winter.
In an effort to improve their chances in 2026, the Orioles have:
-
Traded multiple prospects
-
Sacrificed a competitive balance draft pick to acquire Shane Baz
Those moves signal a willingness to compete now—but not at the expense of completely gutting the future. The front office, led by Mike Elias, has consistently shown restraint when it comes to sacrificing young talent.
That context makes it unlikely Baltimore wants to surrender even more draft capital for a pitcher like Valdez or Gallen, regardless of their star power.
Why Justin Verlander Fits Baltimore’s Current Needs
This is where Verlander becomes a logical option.
Signing Verlander would allow the Orioles to:
-
Add a veteran presence to a relatively young rotation
-
Avoid any draft compensation penalties
-
Spend significantly less money than they would on Valdez or Gallen
From a roster-construction standpoint, Verlander offers a short-term solution that complements, rather than disrupts, Baltimore’s long-term plans.
Paired with Shane Baz and Taylor Rogers, Verlander would give the Orioles a rotation that blends youth, upside, and experience—without mortgaging the farm system.
Not the Ace Fans Want—but a Win-Now Upgrade
To be clear, Verlander is not the ace many fans envisioned when the offseason began. He’s unlikely to throw 200 innings or dominate lineups the way he once did.
But that doesn’t mean he can’t help the Orioles win.
In 2026, Verlander could realistically:
-
Provide league-average to above-average innings
-
Stabilize the rotation during critical stretches
-
Mentor younger pitchers both on and off the field
-
Deliver quality starts in high-leverage games
For a team aiming to remain competitive while continuing to develop internally, that value cannot be dismissed.
Cost Efficiency Matters More Than Ever
Financially, Verlander is also appealing.
At this stage of his career, he’s expected to command roughly half the annual cost of elite starters like Valdez or Gallen. That savings gives the Orioles flexibility to:
-
Address other roster needs
-
Extend key young players
-
Maintain payroll balance for future seasons
In an era where long-term pitching contracts often age poorly, a shorter, more affordable deal with Verlander may actually carry less risk.
Are Valdez and Gallen Still in Play?
The Orioles have not fully closed the door on signing a top-tier starter. However, their reported interest in Verlander suggests a shift in priorities.
Rather than making another splashy free-agent signing, Baltimore appears focused on incremental improvements that preserve organizational depth.
If the right opportunity arises at the right price, Elias may still act. But pursuing Verlander signals a preference for flexibility over flash.
The Bigger Picture for Baltimore
Ultimately, this decision reflects how far the Orioles have come.
A few years ago, adding a pitcher like Justin Verlander would have felt like a desperate gamble. Today, it feels like a measured, calculated move—one that acknowledges both the team’s competitive window and its long-term foundation.
Fans may not love it.
They may want bigger names and bolder headlines.
But baseball success is often built on decisions that make sense on paper, not just in the heart.
And whether fans want to admit it or not, the Orioles’ interest in Justin Verlander fits exactly that description.
