
Could the Kansas City Chiefs Make the Unthinkable Move? Chris Jones Trade Talk Emerges After Stunning Missed Playoffs
For the first time in more than a decade, the Kansas City Chiefs are entering an offseason without postseason football to reflect upon.
The 2025 campaign ended in stunning fashion, as Kansas City missed the playoffs for the first time in 11 years, bringing an abrupt halt to one of the NFL’s most dominant runs. Now, as the organization turns its attention toward 2026, one truth has become unavoidable:
Major change is coming.
From the coaching staff to the depth chart, this offseason feels fundamentally different. The Chiefs are no longer tweaking a championship roster — they are repairing one. And in that process, bold decisions that once felt impossible are suddenly on the table.
Including one involving the most dominant defensive player of the Andy Reid era.
Is it truly unthinkable to imagine the Chiefs trading Chris Jones?
A Defense That Couldn’t Get Home
The warning signs appeared early in 2025, but they became impossible to ignore by season’s end.
Kansas City finished with just 35 total sacks, tied for 22nd in the NFL. For a defense that once thrived on collapsing pockets and forcing quarterbacks into chaos, the regression was alarming.
Too often, opposing passers were comfortable.
Too often, the Chiefs failed to generate pressure with four defenders.
And too often, defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo had to dial up blitzes simply to manufacture disruption.
The defensive line — long considered a strength — became a liability.
That reality places the front seven squarely at the center of Kansas City’s offseason planning.
A Unit in Need of a Facelift
The Chiefs’ defensive line has quietly needed reinforcements for several years.
While Chris Jones remained the centerpiece, the supporting cast around him fluctuated wildly. Young players struggled to develop consistently, veterans rotated in and out, and continuity never fully materialized.
Now, heading into 2026, the situation is even more urgent.
Kansas City could realistically need to replace or upgrade nearly a third of its defensive starters, depending on free-agency outcomes. Depth is thin. Cap flexibility is limited. Draft capital is valuable.
Which raises an uncomfortable but logical question:
Is keeping an aging, expensive defensive tackle the best way forward?
The Tyreek Hill Blueprint Still Lingers
Chiefs fans remember this feeling.
In 2022, Kansas City shocked the league by trading Tyreek Hill — a move that felt catastrophic at the time. Hill was the offense’s heartbeat, a game-breaker few could replace.
Yet that decision ultimately extended the Chiefs’ championship window, allowing them to reload the roster with younger talent while remaining competitive.
Looking back, the trade was painful — but necessary.
That precedent matters.
If the Chiefs were willing to move on from a generational wide receiver in his prime, it becomes easier to imagine them considering a similar reset elsewhere on the roster.
Especially now.
Chris Jones: Still Elite, But No Longer Untouchable
There is no denying Chris Jones’ legacy in Kansas City.
He has been the emotional anchor of the defense, a postseason menace, and one of the most productive interior pass rushers of his generation. His playoff moments alone secured his place in franchise history.
But football is unforgiving when it comes to time.
Jones will turn 32 years old at the start of training camp — a critical age for defensive linemen who rely on explosiveness and leverage.
The numbers reflect the shift.
-
2023: 10.5 sacks in 16 games
-
2024–2025 combined: 12 sacks in 32 games
-
Last two postseasons: 1 total sack
While still disruptive, Jones’ box-score production has clearly declined.
Pressure Numbers Tell a More Complex Story
To be fair, advanced analytics still paint Jones as one of the league’s most active interior defenders.
According to Pro Football Focus:
-
2025: Third-most pressures among defensive tackles
-
2024: Second-most pressures and hits
-
2024: First among all defensive tackles in hurries
Those numbers confirm that Jones remains active around the quarterback.
However, they also highlight a subtle but important issue.
Jones has long been a freelancer — a player willing to gamble on reps in pursuit of splash plays. While that style once made him unstoppable, it has increasingly come at a cost.
Run fits have suffered.
Gap discipline has weakened.
Offenses have grown more comfortable attacking him directly rather than avoiding him.
In a defense already struggling with consistency, those risks have been magnified.
The Salary Cap Reality Cannot Be Ignored
The Chiefs’ cap situation entering 2026 is tight — very tight.
Patrick Mahomes will almost certainly undergo another annual restructure, as he has become the financial backbone of Kansas City’s cap management.
Chris Jones could also be restructured.
But restructures only delay problems — they don’t eliminate them.
According to Over The Cap:
-
Pre–June 1 trade:
-
$29.25 million dead money
-
$15.6 million in cap savings
-
-
Post–June 1 trade:
-
$9.75 million dead money
-
$35.1 million in cap savings
-
That second figure is impossible to ignore.
$35 million in cap flexibility could fundamentally reshape the Chiefs’ offseason strategy.
It could fund multiple starters.
It could accelerate a defensive rebuild.
It could restore balance to a roster that currently has more holes than assets.
What Would Kansas City Get in Return?
No — this would not be another Tyreek Hill-level haul.
Jones’ age and contract prevent that.
But a Day 2 draft pick is entirely plausible, particularly from a contender desperate for interior pass rush help.
Even one premium selection could allow Kansas City to:
-
Add a younger defensive cornerstone
-
Inject cheap talent into a cap-strapped roster
-
Rebuild the defensive line organically
In an offseason where every asset matters, that return could prove invaluable.
Why Brett Veach Might Actually Consider It
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(599x0:601x2)/chris-jones-1-121525-e3494531b7ad4db0b44cb5a4507ae82b.jpg)
General manager Brett Veach has shown a clear roster-building philosophy.
He prefers youth.
He prefers flexibility.
And he has never been afraid to move on one year early rather than one year late.
Jones checks every box that typically triggers difficult conversations:
-
Aging veteran
-
High cap number
-
Declining production
-
Multiple roster holes elsewhere
That doesn’t mean a trade is inevitable.
But it does mean it’s realistic.
A Franchise at a Crossroads
Chris Jones could absolutely retire as a Chief.
His jersey may one day hang in Arrowhead Stadium.
Nothing he has done will ever be forgotten.
Yet the Chiefs are no longer in maintenance mode.
They are in reconstruction mode.
And sometimes, the hardest decisions are the most necessary ones.
As Kansas City enters one of the most pivotal offseasons of the Patrick Mahomes era, nothing should be off the table — not even a move that once seemed impossible.
Because when a dynasty finally cracks, the teams that survive are the ones brave enough to act.