
Alex Bregman is headed to Wrigleyville.
The veteran third baseman has agreed to a five-year, $175 million deal with the Chicago Cubs – a contract that includes a full no-trade clause and no opt-outs. In other words, Bregman got exactly what he was looking for this offseason: security, control, and a long-term commitment from a contender.
At first glance, it’s easy to wonder why the Red Sox didn’t lock him up. After all, Bregman’s bat still plays, and Boston has an opening at third.
But once the full structure of the Cubs’ deal surfaced, it became clear why the Red Sox walked away. They weren’t just outbid – they were out-structured.
The Deal Behind the Deal
Chicago’s offer wasn’t just about the $175 million figure. According to multiple reports, roughly $70 million of that total is deferred.
That means the Cubs will be paying Bregman well into the future, long after his prime years are behind him. Deferred money helps with present-day payroll flexibility and luxury tax calculations, but it also tethers a team to a hefty financial obligation long after the player’s peak.
Boston reportedly offered Bregman a five-year deal worth $165 million, all guaranteed, with significant deferrals of their own. That’s just $2 million less per year than Chicago’s deal – not a massive gap in annual value.
But the no-trade clause? That’s where Boston drew the line.
And that’s what ultimately pushed Bregman to the North Side.
The Red Sox have made it clear in recent years that they’re not in the business of tying themselves to long-term, inflexible contracts. It’s a philosophy that’s frustrated some fans – especially in the wake of departures like Xander Bogaerts – but it’s also one rooted in long-term planning. They’ve prioritized flexibility, both financially and roster-wise, and Bregman’s contract didn’t align with that approach.

A Familiar Pattern for Boston
Let’s rewind to last offseason. Boston offered Bregman a three-year, $120 million deal with opt-outs after each of the first two seasons.
It was front-loaded and gave the player control, but also protected the team from long-term risk. That offer reflected exactly how the Red Sox like to operate: short-term aggressiveness, long-term caution.
This year’s offer – five years, $165 million, with deferrals – was a step up. But again, no full no-trade clause.
Boston wanted to keep some maneuverability, and Bregman wanted full security. Chicago gave it to him.

Why the Cubs Were Ready to Go All-In
For the Cubs, this is a team that’s already turned the corner. After tearing down their 2016 World Series core in 2021, they’ve rebuilt around a new wave of homegrown talent.
They made the playoffs last year and pushed the Brewers to five games in the NLDS. This offseason was about adding, not holding back.
Bregman fits into that timeline. He brings postseason experience, leadership, and a bat that still has plenty of pop. The Cubs could afford to go big – and they did.
The Red Sox’s Bet on the Future
Boston, meanwhile, is playing the long game. And while it stings to lose an All-Star caliber player, the front office is betting that the long-term flexibility gained by not matching Chicago’s deal will pay off down the line.
There’s risk in that, of course. Bregman could thrive in Chicago.
He could stay healthy and productive into his mid-30s. But history tells us that long-term deals for players in their 30s often don’t age well.
Whether it’s injuries, decline at the plate, or just the natural wear and tear of the game, the back end of these contracts rarely delivers full value.
Boston’s decision also reflects confidence in its internal options. Kristian Campbell is looking to bounce back.
Marcelo Mayer is entering his second season and comes with high expectations. Romy Gonzalez adds depth.
The Red Sox aren’t empty at third base – they’re just shifting toward younger, cost-controlled talent.
Final Thoughts
It’s understandable for Red Sox fans to be frustrated. Bregman’s a proven bat, a postseason performer, and the kind of player who brings instant credibility to a lineup.
But the deal he signed with Chicago? That’s a massive commitment – one Boston simply wasn’t willing to make.
In a league where financial flexibility is as valuable as a power bat, the Red Sox chose to stay nimble. And while that might not win the offseason headlines, it could keep them competitive in the seasons that matter most.
Bregman’s gone. That chapter’s closed.
But with Mayer, Campbell, and a focus on smart roster building, Boston’s not waving the white flag. They’re just playing the long game – and betting that patience pays off.