
Robert Griffin III Thinks Cam Newton Needs to Pump the Brakes on Criticism of Drake Maye
Cam Newton has built a media presence in 2026 that few former NFL players could envy. From podcasts to interviews, social media clips, and live appearances, Newton has mastered the art of commentary in the digital age. But there’s a growing concern from one of his peers: Robert Griffin III. Griffin, who himself successfully transitioned into media after retiring from the NFL, believes that Newton’s approach—particularly his repeated criticism of rising star quarterback Drake Maye and the New England Patriots—has crossed a line.
This season, Newton has been relentless. He started in November by dismissing the Patriots’ impressive 9-2 record as “fool’s gold.” Since then, he has repeatedly called out Maye, labeling him a “game manager” rather than a “game-changer” during his 4th & 1 podcast. Newton’s commentary has continued even as Maye has been performing at an MVP-caliber level. From Griffin’s perspective, this isn’t just criticism; it’s ill-timed and potentially damaging.
“I always want to see other guys get into the media game and have success,” Griffin said on his Outa Pocket with RGIII podcast. “And I think Cam, in some ways, is missing the mark here.”

Griffin’s critique isn’t about the talent of Drake Maye or the strategy of the Patriots. It isn’t about questioning whether Josh McDaniels deserves more credit than the second-year quarterback. Instead, Griffin emphasizes timing, intent, and the subtle but critical line between constructive analysis and unnecessary negativity.
“If I could give any advice to my guy—and he doesn’t have to take it—he’s fully entrenched in this media game, and I don’t want to say getting clicks in all that, but he’s fully entrenched in that. He’s a full-time content creator, and his platforms are doing incredible,” Griffin said. “Just take a step back and ask yourself: ‘Is this helping?’ Because Drake Maye loves the guy. He loves him. And you don’t want to be that guy. There’s so many players that hate players that are in the media because of things like that. That’s not worth the click.”
The history between Maye and Newton adds another layer to this story. Maye grew up in Charlotte and has repeatedly mentioned that Newton was his childhood hero. For a young player to idolize someone only to be publicly criticized by that person is a difficult experience. Back in November, when Newton first questioned Maye’s skill and the Patriots’ performance, Maye took the high road, saying he didn’t even know what show Newton was appearing on. That response drew national attention, including from Stephen A. Smith on First Take, who accused Maye of lying—sparking a wave of manufactured drama that Maye never asked for.
Since that initial exchange, Newton has doubled down. He has questioned whether Maye ranks among the league’s top five quarterbacks, attributed the Patriots’ success more to coach Mike Vrabel and offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels than to Maye himself, and pointed to roster changes—like the firing of Jerod Mayo and Alex Van Pelt—as evidence that Maye was not yet a complete quarterback. And most recently, he used the loaded “game manager” label, all while ensuring his subscriber count and social media metrics were front and center.
It’s classic Newton: savvy, calculated, and media-aware. He understands exactly what will generate attention. He knows how to deliver critiques that feel personal without being overtly insulting. It’s a strategy designed to build his brand, drive engagement, and secure clicks in an era where online metrics can outweigh traditional journalism. But while it’s effective for building an audience, Griffin warns that there are consequences beyond the digital world.
“Support that young man, and then when he starts to falter, then you can give constructive criticism,” Griffin said. “But to give criticism when he’s rising, and he’s balling, and he’s about to win MVP, that’s unnecessary.”
Griffin has been in Newton’s shoes. After retiring from football, he had to navigate the tricky transition from celebrated athlete to media personality. He knows firsthand the allure of commentary that sparks debate, draws attention, and sometimes even provokes players. But he also understands the responsibility that comes with having a platform. There is a line between being honest and being harsh for the sake of engagement; between constructive feedback and piling on negativity simply because it generates clicks.
“Timing is everything,” Griffin continued. “It’s one thing to analyze when someone struggles or when there’s room for improvement. It’s another to critique someone who’s thriving, who’s doing exactly what they’re supposed to be doing. You don’t want to undermine a young player who respects you. That’s a long-term relationship you don’t want to damage.”
The situation highlights a larger trend in modern sports media. Former athletes, particularly quarterbacks and other high-profile players, are increasingly turning to podcasts, YouTube, and other digital platforms to comment on active players. This provides them with a voice, a brand, and often a lucrative post-playing career. But the dynamic comes with tension: players critiqued in real time are still human, with emotions, career stakes, and personal respect for those offering commentary. Misjudging the timing or tone of criticism can strain relationships, alter perceptions within the league, and even impact future opportunities for collaboration or mentorship.
In Newton’s case, his strategy has been methodical. He understands how to thread the needle—making bold statements without crossing the line into outright disrespect. But Griffin argues that the needle has shifted; what was once clever and provocative is now veering toward unnecessary and potentially damaging. He suggests that there is a better way for Newton to assert his media influence while still maintaining the respect of players like Maye.
“If Cam wants to continue building his platform and be influential, he has to balance honesty with tact,” Griffin explained. “There’s a way to share insights, educate fans, and offer commentary without putting young guys down while they’re still climbing. And he’s in a position where he can choose how he wants to be remembered in this phase of his career.”
Griffin’s message is not about discouraging Newton. It’s about perspective, responsibility, and the long game. Newton can still provide analysis, share bold opinions, and entertain millions of fans. But Griffin wants him to consider the human element—the relationships behind the headlines. A young quarterback idolizes him. That respect should not be squandered for short-term clicks.
As the NFL continues to evolve, and as social media and digital content redefine how athletes interact with the public, stories like Newton’s and Maye’s illustrate the tension between influence and responsibility. Former players now hold power not just on the field but in the court of public opinion. How they wield that power shapes careers, reputations, and even the culture of the league itself.
Ultimately, Griffin’s advice is clear, grounded in his own experience: support, wait, and choose the right moment. Critique when it matters, but not when it diminishes someone who is thriving. Be influential, but not at the expense of empathy and respect. In Griffin’s view, Newton’s media strategy may be smart, but it is incomplete—missing the nuance that separates a respected voice from a polarizing one.
For Cam Newton, the choice is his. He can continue to push the envelope, grab attention, and dominate the sports media conversation. Or he can take Griffin’s advice, pump the brakes, and consider the broader impact of his commentary on the very players who looked up to him. Either path will define this phase of his career, but only one will preserve the respect of the next generation.
As Griffin said, “You can be bold, you can be loud, you can be entertaining—but never forget: influence carries responsibility. And sometimes, the right thing is simply to wait.”
In the fast-paced, attention-driven world of sports media, that advice may be more important than any critique of a quarterback’s arm, reads, or leadership on the field. For Newton, the question isn’t just about clicks—it’s about legacy.